Reebok Men's Club Memt Classic Sneaker

Comment

The previous reviews are correct as this Club Memt "Fashion" sneaker is not built to handle real court activity like its Club C cousin. The Memts upper is virtually identical to the Club C, but the sole is much thinner and the interior arch support is poor. Hence, this is a decent shoe for wearing indoors on flat surfaces, but would not recommend for serious walking or athletic activities. As noted by other reviewers, the main advantage of the Memt is that its available in Wide sizes. Hence, if you have a normal D-width, I would recommend the regular Club C model. If, like me, you like the sneakers appearance, accept its functional limitations, and need a wide (4E) sneaker, then the Memt style will work.

Show more

Comment

Ive always loved Reeboks but the last two pairs Ive ordered for my father have separated all around the toe. The first pair did this after hed worn them for several months so I didnt think much of it, but the last pair I bought in June for Fathers Day separated in exactly the same way in a matter of a month and a half. Im going to re-order another pair today for Dad and hope this new pair holds up better, because this particuclar Reebok style fits his feet perfectly. Ill update this review after hes had his new shoes for a month or so, unless they separate sooner than that.

Show more

Comment

The key in this description is "fashion". IMHO , these are not athletic shoes! They are shoes that are meant to look like athletic shoes. The sole is paper thin and the insole is gel or memory foam that feels like your socks are all bunched up inside the shoe. I find this very annoying. I am glad I got these for free when I signed up for an Amazon card, Im not out any cash of my own. You would never want to use these for any sport because they simply "look like" sport wear. The should really be more clear about this instead of putting the one word clue "fashion; in the description. I have been a Reebok fan for a long time and these look like real Reeboks because they are. They are much less expensive than the athletic shoes because they are made for looks not performance. It is cheaper to make something look good than it is to make it perform well. I will buy Reebok again but I will make sure I do not get this "fashion" style again by not buying online without checking them out in a store first. Buyer beware.

Show more

Comment

The insole itself is revolutionary indeed but it doesnt fit for all use cases. While it makes you feel very comfortable as you first slide your feet in, walking on any non-uniform platform (pebbles, for example) would be painful, while walking on a uniform one (like asphalt) would feel more comfortable than most other shoes. I dont believe its a complete failure, but it needs a lot more work. The cover of the inside sides of the sneakers is comfortable too but it wears off very quickly. After a couple of weeks of moderate use, I can find small pieces of the something that feels like wool plugging the sneakers, which would feel very uncomfortable if you have to deal with them for an hour or two. The sneakers look alright. I think the durability is average, or lower than average. Comfort depends on what are you walking on. Its a nice show but according to Reeboks scale I think it should be placed below average.

Show more

Comment

Maybe love would be a litt,e strong for how I feel about these shoes, but I’ve had them for about a month and wear them about every other day. Considering I have about 18 other pairs of tennies, I guess I like them a lot. We have a gravel drive and the sole does a more than satisfactory job of protecting my super sensitive feet. Arch support is good but my arches are so high, they seldom touch. For a casual shoe, they are great. They look good and for the price, are extremely well made. The only reason they don’t get 5 stars is they run a tad narrow, but that seems to be a general Reebok thing.

Show more